The English article: It seems simple enough, but sometimes it carries just enough nuance to prompt a review of linguistic accuracy.
For example, you’re looking out your front window at home. A car drives past outside. You turn to the person behind you and say, “I saw the car drive down the street.”
Why didn’t you say, “I saw a car drive down the street”?
The reason is that the articles a/an and the communicate definition or a lack thereof.
We use a/an when we want to identify:
We also use an instead of a when the word following begins with a vowel sound: an egg, an omelet, an institute, an honor. A will always be followed by a word that starts with a consonant sound: a box, a trampoline, a hero, a unique opportunity.
We apply the, on the other hand, when we want to distinguish:
Implementing what we’ve established, let’s return to your front window at home, where you could have just as well said you saw a car instead of the car.
But you didn’t, because you identified it as a particular thing known (the car delivering pizza to your neighbor’s party), a definite thing within a larger category (the only Porsche among your neighborhood’s many cars), or something you needed to specify for understanding (the car in which your daughter is returning from college).
If the article or the existing discussions do not address a thought or question you have on the subject, please use the "Comment" box at the bottom of this page.
We apply the, on the other hand, when we want to distinguish:
a particular person or thing known:
Denise wants the kitten for her birthday. (……… or the kitten instead of the puppy)
I don’t understand the above.
Can we say ” Denise wants a kitten instead of a puppy for her birthday.” ?
Yes, but writing “the kitten” instead of “a kitten” indicates that the sentence is referring to a particular kitten, not just a kitten in general.
Thanks for your comments. If so, “the kitten instead of the puppy” should have been ” this kitten instead of that kitten”?
Either sentence could be correct:
Denise wants the kitten instead of the puppy indicates that she had a choice between one kitten and one puppy, and she chose the kitten.
Denise wants this kitten instead of that kitten indicates that she had a choice between two kittens, and she chose this kitten.
What is the difference between an appositive and a non-restrictive clause?
A nonrestrictive clause is an adjective clause that adds extra or nonessential information to a sentence. An appositive is a word or word group that renames, defines, or further identifies the noun or noun phrase preceding it. An appositive may be restrictive or non-restrictive.
Examples:
My friend Jim Lynch recently asked me a question. (restrictive)
Jim Lynch, my friend, recently asked me a question. (non-restrictive)
I was looking for the place to submit a question, and this appears to be the only place. I really enjoy the Grammar Book!
My request is for a ruling on use of words like “preventative” instead of “preventive;” “administrate” instead of “administer;” “orientate” instead of “orient.”
The Chicago Manual of Style has this to say about preventive and orientate:
“Although the corrupt form preventative (with the superfluous syllable in the middle) is fairly common, the strictly correct form is preventive.”
“To orient is to get one’s bearings or point another in the right direction (literally to find east) {it took the new employee a few days to get oriented to the firm’s suite}. Unless used in the sense ‘to face or turn to the east,’ orientate is a poor variation to be avoided. It is a back-formation from the noun orientation, analogous to the illegitimate interpretate for interpret.”
CMOS does not have any reference to the word administrate, although the dictionaries we consulted acknowledge it as a less common form of administer.
I received an email regarding the correct use for A / An vs. The.
After reading the e-newsletter I took the quiz.
To my surprise, I didn’t do a great job.
I’m now confused regarding vowels. In elementary school I was taught vowels are: A, E, I, O, U, and sometimes Y.
According to the quiz the letter H is a vowel. This is not correct.
Please clarify this.
The letter H is not a vowel. Perhaps you misunderstood our rule stating “We also use an instead of a when the word following begins with a vowel sound.” This does not mean a word that begins with a vowel. Many words and abbreviations that start with the letter H begin with a vowel sound when pronounced.
Examples: honor, hour, HTML, HMO
Please tell me why, in the recent quiz to choose a/an, MADD is treated differently than NBAA. Both have an initial vowel sound when spelling out the acronym (/em/ initial vowel sound for MADD and /en/ initial vowel sound for NCAA). However, question 3 answer was A (a) and question 9 answer was B (an). Why? I speculate ‘a’ was chosen for MADD because the reader could say ‘mad’ which is a consonant sound (rather than say each letter) and ‘an’ was chosen for NCAA because the reader wouldn’t say ‘knack-a.’
Please advise. I am truly curious and this is a hot button for me when proofreading coworkers’ documents.
Your speculation is on the right track. MADD is an acronym and NCAA is an initialism. An acronym is an abbreviation that is pronounced as a word. An initialism is pronounced one letter at a time. See our post Abbreviations vs. Acronyms vs. Initialisms for more information.
As a point of fact, Historic seems to have an audible “H” in America, but not in England. Does it then become correct to use “an” in England, but “A” in America? Is it just a colloquialism at that point?
Yes, it could be different in England vs. the U.S. We should follow the pronunciation rule: use an when the word following begins with a vowel sound, and use a when the word following starts with a consonant sound.
This seems to be a vicious topic among medical transcriptionists, whether to use a or an when referring to RHIT or MT or MTSO (registered health information technician), (medical transcriptionist), (medical transcription service owner). Could you clarify, please, and explain why? Thank you.
Your examples all appear to be initialisms, abbreviations that are pronounced one letter at a time. Because they begin with a vowel sound when pronounced, use an.
Could you kindly clarify why it is only correct to say: “The boy whom I saw was my sister’s classmate”, but ” A man brought in a small girl whose hand was cut…”? Thanks in advance.
In order to answer your question, we would need to further understand the distinction you are looking to make. For example, are you comparing “whom I saw” with “whose hand was cut”?