The two following excerpts express the same thing. Which might you rather read or listen to?
Today I went to the doctor’s office for an exam because I thought I might be getting the flu. I skipped going to the gym after that. I stopped for gas and went home. Beth wanted me to help with her math homework, but I fell asleep watching a sitcom.
Today I went to the doctor’s office for an examination because I thought I might be getting influenza. I skipped going to the gymnasium after that. I stopped for gasoline and went home. Elizabeth wanted me to help with her mathematics homework, but I fell asleep watching a situation comedy.
While some people might prefer the extra formality and articulation in the second version, we’re guessing the majority would prefer the first. That is because it applies a popular linguistic technique: clipping.
Clipping is the reduction of a multisyllabic word to form a new one without changing the original meaning or part of speech. The clipped word represents the bigger word while making it easier to write, spell, and say.
Clipped words differ from abbreviations, which are often punctuated in representing the longer word (Feb. for February), and from contractions, which drop one or more letters to form the new word (don’t for do not).
When they are first coined, clipped words typically do not gain prompt acceptance for formal usage. They more often circulate as colloquialisms until their utility and staying power become well established.
One example is the clipping of the word bot from robot. According to dictionary.com, robot originated in the play R.U.R. in 1920. Robot remained intact until the clipped word bot surfaced between 1985 and 1990 and eventually gained entry into dictionaries.
Clipping typically involves one of four types: initial, final, medial, and complex.
Being informal, most clipped words are formed through a communal process, particularly in the age of condensed communication within texting and social media. More-formal arenas such as academia, the sciences, and professional publishing will likely continue to eschew many such conveniences at first, but over time they too will find themselves aboard the bus—omnibus, we mean.
Using what you’ve learned in this article, identify the type of clipping applied to each word.
1. chute from parachute [final clipping / initial clipping / complex clipping]
2. sci-fi from science fiction [final clipping / initial clipping / complex clipping]
3. mic from microphone [final clipping / initial clipping / complex clipping]
4. lab from laboratory [final clipping / initial clipping / complex clipping]
1. initial clipping
2. complex clipping
3. final clipping
4. final clipping
If the article or the existing discussions do not address a thought or question you have on the subject, please use the "Comment" box at the bottom of this page.
I disagree with one of your examples: bot doesn’t mean the exact same thing as robot.
It was derived from robot, but in typical usage, a bot is software that mimics human interaction. A robot is a physical object.
We may not be in disagreement. Our point is that the clipped word bot was derived from robot. Bot has been used in reference to mechanical devices, and it does appear that the term is becoming more commonly connected with robots without bodies, i.e., computer software.
Would it be grammatically incorrect to clip the word visualization to “viz”?
What about if I wanted to write the plural of the clipped word ending in a z? Is vizes correct? or does the plural form for nouns ending in z only apply to proper nouns?
Thanks!
The dictionaries we consulted list the abbreviation “viz” to be a clipped form of the Latin term videlicet. Therefore, we would not recommend using it as an abbreviation for visualization in formal writing.
Nouns ending in z add -es for plural.